There are certain things if life most people enjoy.
Within the church, those things tend to revolve around gospel preaching,
friendly fellowship, and spiritual growth. On the flip side of the coin, there
are things most people tend to dislike such as needless contention, unnecessary
quarreling, and prideful know-it-all antagonists. On the internet, a person
possessing these attributes is commonly referred to as a keyboard warrior and I
think it's safe to say most of us wish they'd just sit on their hands instead
of typing.
As of recent, I've been paying more and more
attention to an online polemical website called Pulpit & Pen. Perhaps you’ve
heard of it. Truth be told, to a certain degree, this site has been on my radar
for years. I used to view it as a valuable resource when it came to researching
false teachers. Their no-holds-barred mentality was refreshing to see in the
fight against doctrinal error and the stand for truth. After all, when war is
constantly being waged on the truth, can we really sit by idly and watch it get
pummeled with no recourse or consequence? However, I was also very different at
that time. I was in the latter days of my Calvinistic "cage stage"
and was beginning to see the ramifications of my over-the-top, no nonsense
attitude. I began to see how I had caused many to become irritated with my
rants and had begun to see me as divisive, however sincere I was in my efforts
to show the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15). Simply put: a dangerous chapter in
my life was coming to a close. No, it wasn't a danger of spreading false
teaching. It was a danger of causing harmful division by being so ready to
label everybody a false teacher.
Looking back on this time in my life, while being
ashamed, I also have a certain sense of appreciation for it. Having experienced
such a mentality in my own life has given me a strong desire to stand for truth
while also possessing a more mature mindset and method of execution. As I look
upon solid teachers such as John MacArthur, R.C. Sproul, and James White (to
name only but a few), I see what standing for biblical truth should look like.
It's not about calling out error at all costs. It's about standing for truth
while being gracious to brothers and sisters in the Lord. Sometimes, a harsh
rebuke is needed against blatant false teachers or heretics. There’s absolutely
no denying that. After all, if one comes preaching another gospel, he is to be
accursed (Galatians 1:8). However, there are many times where the situation isn’t
quite as dire and gentle correction or even respectful discussion is more
fruitful.
Sadly, this is a lesson certain writers of Pulpit
& Pen have yet to learn. While still having many important things to say,
it's almost as if they're in a perpetual "cage stage". Instead of
standing for truth, it appears as if they stand more for polemics and entering
combat like a well-trained soldier. Whereas it used to be about
warning others
of real wolves in sheep's clothing, it's slowly morphed into an opportunity to
find even the slightest bit of error (even if only perceived) and drop a nuke
on it no matter the cost to unity in the body (Ephesians 4:2-3). Instead of
waiting things out, giving brothers in the faith the benefit of the doubt, and
seeing how things play out, we see harsh attacks that even go so far as saying
such a brother has forsaken the gospel. In reality, it's not much different
than the tactics of mainstream media who are, oftentimes, too quick to release
a story without having all (or any) of the facts and, in the end, they produce
a retraction and apology for the misreporting. However, in the case of P&P,
such retractions and apologies tend to be non-existent because their writers
feel they have done no wrong. I recently had a personal interaction with one of
the writers and I ended up having to walk away from it because it just wasn't
going to produce any fruit. Instead, I felt as if I were being trolled ad
antagonized while the other person clearly felt vindicated, justified, and
"winning" the war on terror. It's this sense of pride that
underscores the writings of P&P. Instead of being gracious truth-seekers,
they're instead laced with pride, assaults, accusations, and defamation.
Ultimately, it lacks Christ-like love and seeks to destroy anything in its
sights. Heaven forbid I end up in their crosshairs for speaking against what
feels like God's anointed ambassador of discernment and eradicator of error. I
may never see the end of it!
All this to say, I highly encourage everyone to go
and read their articles. Don’t just take what I’m saying at face value. I would
be remiss if I failed to acknowledge that they have called out many heretics
over the years. This isn’t the problem. The problem resides in where they fail
to draw the line between heretics and brothers who may err on a particular
topic. Sadly, this has become more and more commonplace. While there are some
diamonds in the rough, much of it is just the rough without the diamond. In my
recent discussion, I was asked for specific examples of where I felt P&P
had erred. To be honest, there's just too much to list. On top of this fact,
there are multitudes who have already dedicated too much time in providing
requested examples. Hence, this article isn't meant to change the mind of
P&P as much as it is meant to encourage you, the reader, to discern the
discerners. Everybody needs to be held in check, including those who deem
themselves to be at the tip of the spear in calling out error. The spear just
isn't always necessary. We don't always need to be waiting in the shadows, ready to strike at the first moment that someone says the wrong thing, uses the wrong verbiage, or takes a contrary position on a secondary issue just so you can know you reported on it before anybody else. This isn't a spirit of discernment. It's a spirit of strife laced with the poison of pride and arrogance. As for the specifics I mentioned earlier, it's like being asked for
specific examples of why a landfill stinks. Sometimes, it's just the overall
smell of garbage.
~Travis W. Rogers
No comments:
Post a Comment